Independence
Most due diligence in senior housing was built for the wrong side of the table.
The frameworks, the market studies, the occupancy reports. They exist to move capital, not protect it. Nordon was built to close that gap.
The Stack
Fourteen diligence workstreams sit between a senior housing LOI and a close. Ten anchor in seller-provided data. Four are partially independent but scoped to questions other than this asset's commercial position. Nordon is the only independent diligence in the stack built to answer what the seller's data cannot answer. That is the structural weakness in how capital underwrites this asset class, and the gap Nordon closes.
Track Record
Unbroken.
100%
Senior housing capital focus
27
Global team members
7
Scoring dimensions per diagnostic
An independent advisory group for capital deploying into senior housing.
The Problem We Solve
Where capital stalls in senior housing.
Every assessment covers the same set of signals. We score each one on its own before forming an overall view. No single finding drives the outcome. The full picture does.
Market data is thin, operator-sourced, and incentivized toward the sale.
The offering memorandum is a selling document. The market study was commissioned by the seller. By the time capital arrives at the table, the information environment has been shaped by people with a reason to present the asset favorably.
Most due diligence frameworks were built for operators, not capital allocators.
Operators need to know how to run an asset. Investors need to know whether to buy it. These are different questions. The tools built for operators (occupancy benchmarks, rate comparisons, census data) do not answer what capital actually needs to know.
By the time the numbers look wrong, repricing is no longer possible.
Capital that discovers a market position problem post-acquisition has no path to repricing. The diagnostic moment is before the commitment. That is the only point in the process where evidence changes the outcome.
The investment committee wants a defensible position. Not a summary.
A summary deck tells the committee what the analyst thinks. A defensible position shows them the evidence, the confidence levels, the risk tiers, and the recommendation. It holds up to the scrutiny of the room.
How We Work
Evidence-graded. Not operator-sourced.
We work with you at every point in a deal, from deciding which market to enter, all the way through to selling.
Principle 01
Independence
We are not engaged by sellers. We are not affiliated with operators. Every diagnostic is produced for the capital side, from external signals only. That is the only way the output means anything.
Principle 02
Confidence Grading
Every data point carries a label: Verified, Observed, Inferred, or Unavailable. We do not smooth over uncertainty. We name it, grade it, and let capital decide what weight to give it.
Principle 03
Committee-Ready Output
The deliverable is not a report for your desk. It is the document your VP of Acquisitions walks into the investment committee with. Forty-five minutes. A defensible position. A clear recommendation.
Frequently Asked Questions
Questions capital allocators ask us.
Everything you need to understand what Nordon does, how we do it, and whether we are the right firm for your deal.
Our DNA
What we are built on.
The Capital Standard
We hold ourselves to the standard capital allocators hold us to. That means independent data, honest uncertainty, and recommendations that hold up in the room.
Evidence Over Consensus
We do not present the comfortable answer. We present the evidenced one. Where the evidence is weak, we say so. Where it is absent, we name the gap.
Permanence Over Trend
We are not built for the news cycle. We are built for the deal cycle. Every decision we make about the firm is made for the long term.
Discretion as Foundation
Our clients trust us with information they have not shared publicly. That trust is not a feature. It is the foundation. We operate accordingly.